British colonialism and millet decline in India: The rise of cash crops, forced opium farming, and export-driven exploitation

British colonialism and millet decline in India: The rise of cash crops, forced opium farming, and export-driven exploitation

Millets have been a cornerstone of Indian agriculture for centuries, providing sustenance to millions across diverse climates and terrains. These drought-resistant grains not only offered food security but also enriched India’s rich agricultural biodiversity. However, during British colonial rule, millet cultivation faced systematic marginalization. This shift resulted from policies that prioritized cash crops, forced opium farming, and export-driven exploitation. These practices disrupted traditional farming systems, reshaping the agricultural landscape and leaving a legacy of food insecurity and environmental imbalance. British colonialism and millet decline

British colonialism and millet decline: Millets in pre-colonial India

Before British colonization, millets like ragi, bajra, jowar, and foxtail were staples for Indian communities, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. Farmers cultivated millets using traditional intercropping techniques that ensured soil fertility, biodiversity, and resilience against drought. These grains required minimal water and thrived in nutrient-poor soils, making them ideal for India’s diverse agro-climatic zones.

Millets also played a central role in India’s food culture and dietary habits. Their high nutritional value, including rich fibre content, essential minerals, and low glycaemic index, made them vital for sustaining large populations. This equilibrium was disrupted with the arrival of British colonial rulers.

The rise of cash crops and marginalization of millets

One of the defining characteristics of British agricultural policy was the promotion of cash crops for export. Crops like cotton, indigo, and sugarcane became the backbone of colonial trade. British administrators pressured Indian farmers to grow these crops instead of subsistence staples like millets.

Why Cash Crops?

  • Economic exploitation: Cash crops provided raw materials for Britain’s textile and manufacturing industries. For instance, cotton from India fuelled the Industrial Revolution.
  • Revenue maximization: Cash crops generated higher market value and export revenue compared to millets, which were largely grown for local consumption.
  • Colonial infrastructure: The British invested in irrigation projects to support high-value crops like rice, wheat, and sugarcane. These crops were water-intensive and dependent on fertile soils, further marginalizing the dryland regions where millets thrived.

Impact on millet cultivation

  • Reduced farmland: The allocation of land for cash crops meant a drastic reduction in farmland for millets.
  • Disrupted ecosystems: Monoculture practices eroded traditional intercropping systems, reducing soil fertility and increasing pest vulnerability.
  • Social implications: Farmers reliant on millets for sustenance and local markets were pushed into growing crops they neither consumed nor profited from.

British colonialism and millet decline: Forced opium farming in Bihar

The British colonial administration’s opium policy exemplified their exploitative approach to agriculture. Bihar emerged as a major hub for opium cultivation under the British Opium Monopoly System.

The Opium monopoly

  • British officials forced farmers to grow opium poppy under strict contracts. Farmers were often coerced with threats or incentivized with marginally better pay, though most ended up in debt.
  • The opium was exported to China, where it was sold illegally, creating a highly profitable trade for the British.

Consequences for millets

  • Loss of arable land: Large tracts of fertile land in Bihar, traditionally used for millet and other grains, were diverted for opium cultivation.
  • Labor diversion: The labour-intensive nature of opium farming left farmers with little time or resources to cultivate food crops.
  • Food insecurity: As millet cultivation declined, local food availability reduced, making communities more vulnerable to famine and malnutrition.

The broader impact of the Opium Trade

The opium smuggling network established by the British wreaked havoc beyond India. In China, it fuelled addiction and economic destabilization, leading to the Opium Wars (1839–42 and 1856–60). While Britain profited immensely, Indian farmers bore the brunt of this exploitation, with their agricultural systems upended.

Export-driven exploitation and the decline of millets

The British Empire’s emphasis on export-oriented agriculture further marginalized millet cultivation. Railways were built to facilitate the transportation of cash crops and grains like rice and wheat to ports, leaving millet-growing regions disconnected from major trade routes. This lack of market access reduced the economic viability of millets.

Policies that hurt millets

  1. Permanent Settlement Act (1793): Under this system, zamindars collected taxes from farmers. To meet tax demands, farmers prioritized high-value crops like indigo or sugarcane, sidelining millets.
  2. Monoculture promotion: The British encouraged the monoculture of rice, wheat, and cotton, which disrupted traditional multi-cropping systems that included millets.
  3. Export-first focus: Indian agriculture was reoriented to serve British markets. Grains like rice and wheat were exported in large quantities, while millets were ignored as they lacked global demand.

British colonialism and millet decline and it impact on local communities

Famine and starvation: The reallocation of resources to export crops meant fewer food grains for local consumption. Famines, like the Bengal Famine of 1943, were exacerbated as communities were left without adequate food supplies.

Nutritional decline: Millets are nutritionally superior to rice and wheat. Their decline contributed to widespread nutritional deficiencies in the population.

British colonialism and millet decline and the neglect of dryland agriculture

Millets are uniquely suited to dryland farming, requiring minimal water and thriving in harsh conditions. However, British colonial policies neglected dryland agriculture entirely.

Irrigation bias

The British constructed extensive irrigation networks to support water-intensive crops like sugarcane and rice. Meanwhile, arid and semi-arid regions, where millets thrived, received no such support.

This focus on irrigated agriculture marginalized dryland farmers and their millet-dependent systems.

Loss of indigenous knowledge

Traditional millet farming relied on indigenous knowledge of soil management, crop rotation, and pest control. With the promotion of British agricultural practices, much of this knowledge was lost, reducing productivity and resilience.

The long-term impact on India’s agriculture

The decline of millet cultivation during British rule had far-reaching consequences that continue to affect India today.

Food security and famine

  • The marginalization of millets left India’s food systems vulnerable to droughts and climate variability. Famines became more frequent, with millions perishing due to food shortages.
  • Post-independence agricultural policies, heavily influenced by the Green Revolution, continued to prioritize rice and wheat over millets, perpetuating the colonial legacy.

Nutritional deficits

  • Millets are rich in fibre, iron, and calcium, making them essential for a balanced diet. Their decline contributed to widespread malnutrition, particularly in rural areas.
  • The emphasis on rice and wheat led to a diet lacking in diversity, exacerbating health issues like diabetes and anaemia.

Loss of biodiversity

  • Indigenous millet varieties, adapted to India’s diverse agro-climatic zones, were replaced by standardized crops. This loss of genetic diversity reduced resilience to pests and climate change.

Millet revival in modern India

In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of millets. Government initiatives and global advocacy are helping revive millet cultivation as a sustainable and nutritious option.

Key Initiatives

  1. The International Year of Millets (2023): Declared by the UN, this initiative highlighted the benefits of millets and encouraged global adoption.
  2. National Food Security Mission: India has introduced subsidies and incentives to promote millet farming and consumption.
  3. Climate resilience: As climate change impacts agriculture, millets are gaining attention for their ability to withstand drought and poor soil conditions.

Conclusion: A legacy of exploitation and hope for renewal

The marginalization of millet cultivation under British colonial rule was a result of exploitative policies that prioritized profits over people. The rise of cash crops, forced opium farming, and export-driven agriculture disrupted traditional farming systems, leaving lasting socio-economic and environmental consequences.

However, the revival of millet farming in recent years offers hope. As India rediscovers the value of these ancient grains, there is potential to rebuild sustainable agricultural systems, improve nutrition, and mitigate the effects of climate change. Recognizing the lessons of colonial history is essential to ensure that such mistakes are not repeated.

Bibliography

  1. Guha, R. (1982). A rule of property for Bengal: An essay on the Idea of Permanent Settlement. Oxford University Press.
  2. Blyn, G. (1966). “Agricultural trends in India, 1891–1947: Output, availability, and productivity.” The Journal of Economic History.
  3. Stokes, E. (1980). The Peasant and the Raj: Studies in Agrarian Society and Peasant Rebellion in Colonial India. Cambridge University Press.
  4. Bayly, C. A. (1983). Rulers, townsmen, and bazaars: North Indian society in the age of British expansion 1770–1870. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Davis, M. (2001). Late Victorian holocausts: El Niño famines and the making of the Third World. Verso Books.
  6. UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2023). “The International Year of Millets.”
  7. Yadav, O. P. et al. (2024). “Production and cultivation dynamics of millets in India.” Crop Science.

Image Courtesy: ACCENTERRA

Did you find this blog post helpful? Got ideas or questions? Join the conversation below! Your insights could help others too, so don’t hesitate to share!
Please note that all comments will be moderated before being published.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.