How British colonial policies marginalized rainfed agriculture in India and their lasting impact

British colonial rule in India brought sweeping changes to agriculture. While much attention is given to the introduction of cash crops and irrigation, the marginalization of rainfed agriculture remains underexplored. Before colonial interference, rainfed farming supported millions, offering food security in semi-arid regions. However, the focus on commercial crops like indigo, cotton, and opium, alongside irrigation systems for export-oriented grains, disrupted this balance. Today, we still feel the effects of these policies on food security, crop diversity, and climate resilience. This blog explores how British colonial policies marginalized rainfed agriculture and why reviving it is crucial for sustainable farming.

Understanding rainfed agriculture and British colonial policies

Rainfed agriculture refers to farming practices dependent on natural rainfall rather than artificial irrigation. It typically thrives in arid and semi-arid regions and is best suited for crops like millets, pulses, sorghum, and oilseeds. These crops are drought-resistant, require fewer inputs, and have a lower environmental footprint. Historically, they were the backbone of rural diets and economies, especially in India, where a large portion of the population relied on subsistence farming.

Before colonial rule, Indian farmers adopted diverse cropping systems, combining rainfed and irrigated methods to maximize yield and minimize risk. Millets, for instance, were a staple food for rural communities, providing essential nutrients like iron, calcium, and fiber.

However, the arrival of British rule brought systemic changes to agriculture that prioritized revenue over sustainability.

How British colonial policies marginalized rainfed farming

1. Focus on cash crops: British policies heavily promoted cash crops like indigo, cotton, sugarcane, and opium. These crops were highly profitable for export markets, aligning with the economic goals of the colonial administration. However, they required significant irrigation and inputs, which were often unavailable in rainfed regions. Traditional crops like millets and sorghum, which thrived without irrigation, were neglected.

Farmers were often coerced into growing cash crops, leaving little room for subsistence farming. For example, in Bihar and Bengal, fertile lands were diverted to opium cultivation, displacing traditional food crops (Kumar, 2012). This shift undermined the resilience of rainfed agricultural systems.

2. Land revenue systems: Colonial revenue systems like the Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari System forced farmers to pay exorbitant taxes. The high tax burden incentivized the cultivation of high-value commercial crops. Rainfed crops, being less lucrative in the eyes of the colonial administration, became economically unviable for many farmers.

In regions like central India, which were historically millet-growing zones, farmers abandoned rainfed crops to focus on cash crops that could fetch higher returns. This policy created a vicious cycle, where farmers faced reduced food security while also risking financial instability.

3. Irrigation development and neglect of rainfed areas: The British invested heavily in irrigation infrastructure, such as canals and dams, to boost the production of rice and wheat. While these crops were profitable for export and urban markets, they were unsuitable for rainfed regions. As a result, rainfed farming areas, which lacked irrigation facilities, were marginalized.

The focus on irrigation skewed agricultural development toward regions with canal systems, leaving vast tracts of rainfed land ignored. This approach not only reduced millet cultivation but also widened regional disparities in agricultural productivity (Guha, 1982).

4. Disruption of local food systems: Millets and other rainfed crops were integral to local food systems before British rule. They were easy to store, nutrient-rich, and formed the basis of traditional diets. However, the colonial emphasis on commercial agriculture disrupted this system. Rice and wheat, seen as more “prestigious” grains, replaced millets in urban and export markets.

This transition not only marginalized millet cultivation but also altered dietary patterns. Communities that once relied on rainfed farming for sustenance faced food insecurity and malnutrition as they were pushed toward mono-cropping systems.

5. Impact of famine policies: The British administration’s famine policies further exacerbated the neglect of rainfed agriculture. Famines like the Bengal Famine of 1943 revealed the dangers of relying on water-intensive crops like rice. Millets, which are more drought-resistant and suitable for marginal lands, could have alleviated food shortages. However, the colonial government’s focus on exporting grains to Britain left little room for promoting rainfed crops.

The lasting impact of British colonial policies

The effects of British colonial policies on rainfed agriculture continue to shape Indian farming systems. Several long-term consequences are evident even today.

1. Decline in millet cultivation: Post-independence, millet cultivation remained marginalized as agricultural policies prioritized water-intensive crops. The Green Revolution of the 1960s further entrenched this bias, promoting rice and wheat over rainfed crops.
2. Increased vulnerability to climate change: Millets and other rainfed crops are highly resilient to climate change, requiring less water and thriving in poor soils. However, the colonial-era shift toward irrigation-dependent crops has made Indian agriculture more vulnerable to droughts and water scarcity.
3. Loss of nutritional security: Millets are nutrient-dense, offering high levels of protein, fibre, and essential minerals. Their decline has contributed to malnutrition in rural areas, where rice and wheat dominate diets but offer lower nutritional value.
4. Economic and regional inequalities: The neglect of rainfed regions during colonial rule perpetuated regional inequalities in agricultural productivity. States with limited access to irrigation still struggle with lower yields and economic development.

Reviving rainfed agriculture

Efforts to revive rainfed agriculture and promote millets are gaining momentum. Key initiatives include:

• International Year of Millets 2023: Declared by the UN at India’s request, this initiative highlights the nutritional and environmental benefits of millets.
• Government subsidies and research: Programs to support millet farming and develop drought-resistant varieties are being implemented.
• Public awareness campaigns: NGOs and agricultural organizations are promoting millets as a sustainable and nutritious alternative to rice and wheat.

Reviving rainfed agriculture is not just about historical justice—it is a practical necessity for building a resilient and sustainable agricultural system.

The road ahead

India can learn valuable lessons from the mistakes of the past. Prioritizing rainfed agriculture offers multiple benefits, from improving food security to addressing climate change. Policymakers, farmers, and consumers must work together to support traditional crops and farming systems.

By focusing on crops like millets, India can restore balance to its agricultural sector and ensure a more equitable future for rainfed farming communities.

Conclusion

British colonial policies marginalized rainfed agriculture, altering India’s farming landscape in profound ways. The focus on cash crops and irrigation disrupted traditional practices, leading to food insecurity and environmental degradation. Today, reviving rainfed agriculture is essential for addressing these challenges. By promoting millets and other resilient crops, India can honor its agricultural heritage while building a sustainable future.

Bibliography

1. Guha, R. (1982). Subaltern Studies: Writings on South Asian History and Society. Oxford University Press.
2. Kumar, D. (2012). The Cambridge Economic History of India. Cambridge University Press.
3. Chaudhuri, B. B. (Ed.). (2008). Peasant History of Late Pre-Colonial and Colonial India. Pearson Education India.
4. Thorner, D., & Thorner, A. (1962). Land and Labour in India. Asia Publishing House.
5. UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2023). “The International Year of Millets.”.
6. Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford University Press.

Image Courtesy: ACCENTERRA

Did you find this blog post helpful? Got ideas or questions? Join the conversation below! Your insights could help others too, so don’t hesitate to share!
Please note that all comments will be moderated before being published.